| 首页| 海绵宝宝| 芈月传| 同床异梦| 百度翻译| 永不磨灭的番号| 猎场| 人龙传说|
您的位置:首页 > 新闻中心 > 社会 > 正文

请回答1988

What to Know About Japan’s Plan to Release Fukushima Water Into the Ocean_我的网站

公寓

一 |     今年三伏期间,我国多地持续高温,使防晒降温服热卖。在商品宣传中,相关商家为这类服装贴上“冰感”“UPF2000+”“玻尿酸护肤”等标签。  那么,防晒降温服真有这些功能吗?消费者会不会交了智商税?科技日报记者就此采访了相关专家,为您一探究竟。    

Japan as soon as this week will begin the controversial release of treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant into the ocean.
The Japanese government approved the plan two years ago, saying it is necessary to decommission the power plant, which is operated by Tokyo Electric Power Company. Releases will start Thursday “if they encounter no obstacles,” Prime Minister Fumio Kishida announced this week.
“I have asked TEPCO to swiftly prepare for the water discharge in accordance with the plan approved by the Nuclear Regulation Authority, and expect the water release to start on Aug. 24, weather conditions permitting,” Kishida said.
Despite pushback from neighboring nations and fishing groups, Japanese officials said the plan is safe.
What Is the Release Process? 
The wastewater has gone through treatment and is stored in large tanks. Japanese officials say the water needs to be removed so the plant can be decommissioned.
The water will be diluted and released through an underwater tunnel off the coast of Japan. Officials say it will not be near areas where routine fishing occurs.
The entire process is expected to take decades.
Is the Treated Water Safe?
The release plan has been approved by Japan’s nuclear regulation agency and given the go-ahead by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the global nuclear watchdog.
The IAEA’s two-year review of the plan – which involved sampling and testing the treated water – found it to be consistent with the agency’s safety standards with “negligible” impacts to humans and the environment.
“Based on its comprehensive assessment, the IAEA has concluded that the approach and activities to the discharge of ALPS treated water taken by Japan are consistent with relevant international safety standards,” IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said in a statement last month.
“Furthermore, the IAEA notes the controlled, gradual discharges of the treated water to the sea, as currently planned and assessed by TEPCO, would have a negligible radiological impact on people and the environment,” he added.
The agency will monitor the water’s release and have a continuous presence on-site at the discharge facility.
“This will ensure the relevant international safety standards continue to be applied throughout the decades-long process laid out by the Government of Japan and TEPCO,” Grossi said.
Nearly all radioactivity has been removed from the treated water – except tritium.
Tritium is a radioactive form of hydrogen that occurs naturally and is also a byproduct of producing electricity at nuclear power plants. It cannot be filtered out of the nuclear wastewater.
Japan plans to dilute the water to bring the level of tritium below regulatory standards. This practice is done at other nuclear power plants, including in the U.S.
One of the biggest critics of the plan is Beijing, a top consumer of exports from Japanese fisheries. Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin recently called Japan’s decision “selfish and irresponsible.”
“In disregard of the strong concerns and firm opposition from the international community, the Japanese government announced the decision to start releasing the Fukushima nuclear-contaminated water into the ocean from Aug. 24,” Wang said during a press conference this week, according to a transcription. “This is extremely selfish and irresponsible, as the discharge will spread the risks of nuclear contamination to the rest of the world. And by doing so, Japan is putting its selfish interests above the long-term well being of the entire humanity. China is gravely concerned and strongly opposed to this.”
Hong Kong’s leader this week said the city would "immediately activate" import controls on Japanese seafood to begin on Thursday – the same day as the planned water release.
South Korean activists have also protested the plan, but Seoul recently concluded from its own study that there aren’t any scientific issues.
"Our government has judged that the Japanese side will discharge the contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant as originally planned and has determined that there are no scientific or technical problems with the planned discharge of the contaminated water," Office for Government Policy Coordination Park First Deputy Park Ku-yeon said this week.
Asked about the situation during a trilateral meeting with President Joe Biden and Prime Minister Kishida at Camp David last week, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol answered diplomatically but with obvious concern – assigning the issue the “highest priority” and calling for transparency.
“The Fukushima plant's treated water, if it's going to have some type of impact, it would flow through the entire Pacific Ocean having an impact not just on our three countries but all countries around the world,” Yoon said through a translator. “As such, for the sake of safety and health of the people of our three countries and all members of the international community, that should be something that we need to place the highest priority on. Regarding this treated water, based on scientific principles, all of the processing should be carried out accordingly. And at the same time, internationally recognized and reliable IAEA's investigation results are something that we can trust. And I would like to make sure that everything is conducted and carried out in accordance with the procedures established by the IAEA.”
Japan’s plan has faced strong opposition from local fishing groups.
Kishida met with leaders of the Japanese fishery industry on Monday to pledge long-term support for fishing communities.
But Masanobu Sakamoto, head of the National Federation of Fisheries Cooperatives, said his group remained opposed to the plan, even though some members have gained confidence about its safety.
“Scientific safety and the sense of safety are different,” Sakamoto said. “Even if it’s safe, reputational damage occurs.”
What Was the 2011 Fukushima Disaster?
A magnitude 9.0 earthquake off the coast of Japan triggered a tsunami that hit the Fukushima power plant, triggering meltdowns in three reactors that contaminated the cooling water.
The accident was given the highest rating on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale due to the high radioactive releases from the plant.
  冰丝类服饰:  只能提供瞬间凉感  “接触即冰爽”是冰丝类服饰主打的卖点。商家宣称在这类服装纤维中添加了“超微凉感因子”,能够让皮肤在接触衣物的瞬间获得“透心凉”的感觉。  这种“冰感”在纺织科学中有据可查。国家标准GB/T35263-2017《纺织品接触瞬间凉感性能的检测和评价》将其定义为:皮肤与温度较低的织物接触瞬间,皮肤表面热量快速流失、温度下降,经温觉神经末梢传导至大脑所形成的凉爽感觉。  天津工业大学纺织科学与工程学院教授夏兆鹏介绍,织物之所以能够具有这种瞬间凉感,主要依靠以下三种方式:一是增强织物吸湿、导湿能力,利用汗液蒸发带走热量;二是提高织物导热率,将体热迅速导出;三是提高织物对太阳光的反射率和人体红外发射率实现降温。  夏兆鹏说,上述三种方式只能够使织物具有瞬间凉感,当织物吸热后温度逐渐与人体持平,凉感便会消失。  近年来,添加了木糖醇的冰丝运动服走向市场。

二 | 相关商家称,这种服装的面料嵌入了木糖醇凉感微胶囊,可以在接触皮肤的瞬间释放清凉。  夏兆鹏介绍,木糖醇遇水溶解时会吸收热量,能够带来凉感。

三 | 目前,将木糖醇引入纺织品的工艺主要有两种:一是在纺丝阶段,把木糖醇与脂肪类物质等制成纳米微胶囊,再将其添加到纺丝原液中,制成凉感纤维;二是通过后整理工艺,将木糖醇微胶囊调配成整理液,把织物浸泡其中,让微胶囊均匀附着在面料上,也可将整理液直接涂在织物表层。  “目前,这两种工艺都面临挑战。它们既要防止木糖醇在穿着和洗涤过程中溶解流失,又要保证汗液能够与木糖醇充分接触以产生吸热效应。”夏兆鹏介绍,现阶段,这类产品在长期保持凉感方面仍然存在明显短板,并非像宣传中说的那样“一穿即凉、越穿越凉”。

四 |   玻尿酸防晒衣:  相关成分无法渗透皮肤  近年来,玻尿酸防晒衣、面膜衣走红网络。商家宣称,这类衣物不仅能够阻隔紫外线,而且可以像面膜一样为皮肤持续补水保湿,实现“防晒养肤两不误”。在皮肤科医生和纺织专家看来,这种说法毫无科学依据。

五 |   玻尿酸的学名是透明质酸。作为一种大分子多糖,它的分子量往往高达数十万乃至数百万道尔顿,而皮肤角质层的屏障功能决定了只有极小的分子才可能渗透。  “日常涂抹护肤品时,透明质酸主要停留在皮肤表面起到保湿作用,很难进入真皮层,更不用说仅靠衣物与皮肤的短暂摩擦渗入皮肤。”天津市泰达医院皮肤科主任陈保疆介绍,与此同时,防晒衣多采用宽松设计,穿着时衣物与皮肤之间空隙较大,根本达不到商家所宣称的“紧密贴合、持续滋养”。

六 |   不仅如此,透明质酸极易溶于水。“三伏天,人体出汗量大,防晒衣又需要频繁换洗,无论是汗液浸泡还是洗涤过程,都会让织物中添加的透明质酸迅速溶解流失。”陈保疆介绍,当这些成分被洗掉后,所谓的玻尿酸防晒衣就只是一件价格虚高的普通防晒衣。消费者没必要为这种护肤噱头买单。  除了玻尿酸防晒衣,目前市面上还有不少高UPF值防晒衣,有的甚至标注“UPF200+”“UPF2000+”,防晒力似乎极强。  夏兆鹏介绍,根据国家标准GB/T18830-2009《纺织品防紫外线性能的评定》,只有当UPF值大于40且UVA透过率小于5%时,才能称为防紫外线产品;当UPF值大于50,产品即可标注“UPF50+”,此时紫外线阻隔率已经超过98%。  “有些防晒衣标注‘UPF200+’甚至‘UPF2000+’,看上去UPF值增加了数倍,但实际防护收益增量很少。

七 | ”夏兆鹏对记者说。

八 |   夏兆鹏建议,消费者在选购防晒衣时不必为虚高的UPF值支付溢价,“UPF50+”就已足够。

九 |   空调服:  不适合日常久穿  最近,为了应对高温天气,许多网友看上了原本为户外作业者设计的穿戴式空调服。  不少商家宣称,穿上这种衣服如同“穿”上了空调,按下衣服上的开关就可以实现快速降温、长效制冷,让人在酷暑中也能全身凉爽。然而,专家指出,现阶段其技术远未达到大规模民用的程度。  夏兆鹏介绍,市面上的穿戴式空调服主要分为风扇通风式和半导体制冷式。风扇通风式的原理是加速汗液蒸发带走热量,但在高温高湿环境中,空气本身温度高、湿度大,仅靠吹风很难有效降低体感温度。半导体制冷式虽然能够主动降温,但制冷效果多集中在腰、背部,且制冷模块与沉重的电池包显著增加了人体负担。

十 |   “总体而言,这种穿戴式空调服普遍存在电池续航短、工作噪声大、穿戴不舒适、适用场景受限等问题。

十一 | 要想将其真正应用于日常穿着,还需解决设备柔性化、小型化等问题。”夏兆鹏说。

十二 |   陈保疆提醒,使用这类产品还存在健康隐患。“长时间让冷风直吹腰、背部,容易引起局部毛细血管收缩,导致腰痛、关节酸痛甚至感冒。心血管脆弱人群体表被强制快速降温,可能引发血管痉挛,加重心脏负担。  除此之外,陈保疆说,穿戴式空调服内置电池较重,长期穿戴还容易导致肌肉疲劳;且其内部结构复杂、难以彻底清洗,易滋生细菌,长期穿着可能引起皮肤过敏或呼吸系统感染。  链接  选购时应把舒适与防护放在首位  天津工业大学纺织科学与工程学院教授夏兆鹏在接受科技日报记者采访时说,面对五花八门的防晒降温服,消费者应跳出“越贵越好”“功能越多越好”的误区,回归衣物本质,把舒适与防护放在第一位,不要被所谓的高科技标签迷惑。  材质上,聚酯纤维防晒速干、性价比高;锦纶轻薄透气、适合运动;棉、麻、丝等天然纤维的吸湿透气性往往是许多“黑科技”面料难以比拟的,穿着更舒爽。  “大家在室内办公,可以选天然棉麻;当身处户外时,可以选聚酯防晒面料;若要高强度运动,优先选锦纶。”夏兆鹏说。  颜色上,深色系防晒效果略好,但浅色系吸热少。

十三 | 款式上,优先选择带透气孔、网眼设计或宽松剪裁的衣物,有利于汗液蒸发,避免闷热。(记者 陈 曦)。

Current article:http://5h2v0.shuazhepenxingshuaisenqienai.buzz/news/20260826_2309709.html

Published on:04:51:31


24小时排行